Hector Ruiz-Cadenas vs Marc Sieber Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L W W L
Form
L L L W W W L L W LH2H: Ruiz-Cadenas 0 - 1 Sieber
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruiz-Cadenas winning 1 and Sieber winning 2. The last match between Ruiz-Cadenas and Sieber was at the Germany F16, 18-08-2008, Quarterfinals, Clay with Marc Sieber getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hector Ruiz-Cadenas | 0 |
| Marc Sieber | 1 |
Germany F16(18-08-2008)
6
4
0
6
6
3
| Ruiz-Cadenas | Stats | Sieber |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 205 | Highest Rank | 236 |
| 42 | Age | 37 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 5 | Titles | 13 |
| 58% (207-153) | Career Total W/L | 63% (429-249) |
| $1,865 | Career Prize Money | $660 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruiz-Cadenas VS Sieber H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 0-6 6-3 | |||||
Ruiz-Cadenas VS Sieber H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hector Ruiz-Cadenas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 0-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Mikhail Ledovskikh
Player
Hector Ruiz-Cadenas
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hector Ruiz-Cadenas
Player
Komlavi Loglo
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Sieber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Marc Sieber
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Sieber
Player
Robin Kern
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Albano Olivetti
Player
Marc Sieber
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
36
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
1
94%
(
50 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Marc Sieber
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Sieber
Player
Max Wiskandt
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Marc Sieber
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Marc Sieber
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Zeballos
Player
Marc Sieber
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (207/153) | Win/Loss | 63% (429/249) |
| 56% (455/356) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (947/601) |
| 53% (3902/3465) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7687/6215) |
| 25% (2/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 74% (131/46) |
| 59% (205/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (262/166) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (36/37) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 364 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 687 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 453.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 595.09 |
| 60% (245/405) | 1st Serve % | 68% (11388/16710) |
| 66% (161/245) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (7402/11388) |
| 47% (75/160) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2604/5322) |
| 43% (19/44) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1075/2196) |
| 40% (153/382) | Return Points Win % | 46% (7815/16884) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (68/46) | Challenger W/L | 51% (77/74) |
| 57% (135/101) | Futures W/L | 68% (351/169) |
| 58% (203/352) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (419/663) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (39/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (67/133) |
| 56% (55/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (105/201) |
| 86% (204/176) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (422/373) |
| 14% (204/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (422/49) |
| 21% (156/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (256/55) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
